Whilst
I applaud the government’s decision to finally start injecting money into the real economy, instead of just into the
bond market via quantitative easing, there are much better ways to spend £34bn
to stimulate economic growth. To label the project as an ‘investment in
Britain’ is also misleading – this isn’t money coming into the country or created
here through productive enterprise, it’s money we’ve yet to borrow, on top of our national debt of £1.11Tn, increasing
to £1.4Tn by the end of the year. You and I will have to pay for this through
our taxes.
As
a Chartered Engineer, I’m all in favour of progress, modernisation and big
infrastructure projects, but as a politician, I’m all for Sound Economics.
Unfortunately, for HS2 the sums just don’t add up.
The
government claim that HS2 will spread wealth from London to The North. Can you really see HSBC
relocating their International Headquarters to Rotherham ?
Goldman-Sachs in Grimsby ?
Citibank in Stockport ? No, for exactly the
same reason that you won’t see Car Factory in Canary Wharf .
In putting forward this argument the politicians merely demonstrate their lack
of understanding of business and industry. Companies locate in given areas
because of an abundance of necessary skills, raw materials, competitive
corporate taxation and low operating costs, not because you can get there 30
minutes faster from London .
Throughout
the discussions over HS2, I’ve yet to hear one business leader say “Yes, we’ll
build a new factory in the north because of this new train line”. All this
project will achieve is an expansion of the London commuter belt, sucking yet more
industry from the regions.
If
the government really wants to generate economic growth in The North by
spending on rail, they could develop our derelict Rail Yards into freight hubs,
giving manufacturers fast, cheap access to ports and stimulating employment.
They’d investing in additional rolling stock and capacity on important, local
commuter lines, where the real problems lie. They’d encourage the manufacture
of trains in our country, instead of
consigning factories like Bombardier in Derby
to the scrap-bin. They’d introduce proper competition on our railways instead
of the flawed and botched franchise system, to create competition, improve
services and lower costs.
Instead of 300
jobs maintaining HS2 trains,
I'd like to see 3,000 jobs designing and building trains here in Crewe and would invest, and adopt policies to make this
more likely.
The
misguided and wasteful HS2 project merely goes to illustrate three things about
the politicians from the old, failed parties. They’re out of touch with
industry, their understanding of economics is flawed, and they’re still happy
to waste billions of pounds of your money to buy a few positive headlines.
This, we have come to expect from Labour, however, the failure of Conservative
Politicians goes some way to demonstrate why many of their traditional
supporters have deserted them.
Finally,
anyone under this misapprehension that
this was a policy dreamt up in London should
consult European Council Directive
96/48/EC, emanating from that fount of all policies inappropriate, unnecessary
and unaffordable - Brussels .
Cllr.
Stuart Hutton, (UKIP).
No comments:
Post a Comment